G
O
T
C
H
A
!
|
fravia's
anonymity pages
Enemy tracking
0) Some simple stalking tools
1) General stalking techniques
2) Reversing language patterns
3) Luring and social engineering tricks
Fravia's Nofrill
Web design
(98 ~ 99)
|
updated
June 1999
|
Fravia's Anonymity Academy
Enemy tracking1) General stalking techniques
(Fravia shows you what you can do - or try - and where you can learn some
advanced stalking techniques)
~
Enemy tracking, a very difficult art, can be divided into stalking, reversing language patterns and luring. In order to
stalk you need a deep knowledge of Usenet spamming (and war) techniques like flaming,
trolling and crossposting. A good reverser can moreover easily 'reconstruct' (part of) the
snailtrail of his
enemies and defeat their smoke curtains
applying some easy semantical reverse engineering tricks. Finally the reverser will
lure his targets into the open web and identify it.
0) Some simple stalking tools
1) General stalking techniques
1.1) Simple email stalking techniques
2) Reversing language patterns
3) Luring and social engineering tricks
|
|
|---|
Based on some private emailings from +ORC
"...they track us, our interests and our hosts, we track them,
their interests and their hosts, it's an interesting match and we'll
always win, coz we do not do it for money... Work well, +ORC"
[Searching through headers and other tricks]
[An older simple stalking attempt]
[Stalking the stalkers' tool]
[Balif's stalking masterpiece]
[Other links and tools]
[Fravia's antispamming related page]
[how to keep in exercise]
__Stalking, an introduction__
(Part of the following: courtesy of Judith S. Donath)
Identity plays a key role on the web. In communication,
which is the primary scope of any web-related activity, knowing the identity of those with
whom you communicate is essential for understanding and evaluating an
interaction. Yet in the disembodied world of the virtual
community, identity is extremely ambiguous. Many of the basic
cues about personality and social role we are accustomed to in the physical
world are absent. Other cues are presents yet difficult to interpret. If you receive email from
a guy whose address Eric.Staunton@innocent.com with an attached image
of a middle aged man sitting comfortably on the patio of his house, you may be fooled
into thinking that you have to do with a guy named Eric Staunton. It could be, yet you'll
never have any real proof of it. One can have, on the web, as many electronic
personas as one has time and energy to create (and memory to recall :-)
Yet, while it is true that a single person can create multiple electronic identities that are
linked only by their common progenitor, that link, almost invisible in the virtual
world, is of great significance. That is the weak point of any virtual created identity. It's easy
to say that your avatars should have 'coherent' personalities , i.e. if you create a 'lorry driver'
personality and a 'university professor' personality, the two should have COMPLETELY different
speech patterns), yet this is very difficult to implement. Stalkers should be very versatile
experts, ready to read and recognize voluntarily altered speech patterns.
Usenet, for obvious reason
is the field you should peruse to learn the first elements of the stalking art. See:
most of Usenet is meant to be non-fiction; the basic premise is that the users are who they
claim to be. There are, however variances between the different newsgroups
as to what constitutes a real or "legitimate" identity. And there are numerous cases of
identity deception, from the pseudo-naive trolls to the name-switching spammers.
Yes, there's a vocabulary you should
learn:a) Flaming: I.e. rude comments, insults, personal attacks, etc.
b) Trolling: I.e. fishing for flames. Usually takes the form of inane
postings like smarmy love chatter, useless pieces of boring
information, McClatchie's FAQ, etc.
c) Cascades: Endless meaningless threads the posters repeat the same
phrase over and over, sometimes with a little variation. They are
amusing to the ones participating in them, boring to everyone else.
Boring
as most of these little silly wars are, there are GREAT lessons in stalking hidden in there (as
you'll see if you follow the links below). That's why you too will
have to deal with this. Actually, as usual in the Web, many of our techniques cross and merge reciprocally:
anonymity techniques, how to search knowledge, reality reversing tricks, usenet techniques,
anti-spamming knowledge are ALL required to tackle some of the tasks that you'll have
to perform if you really intend to master what you are trying to learn now. Let's, moreover not
forget how useful will be our holy software reversing skills each time we'll decide to
use some of the many tools that the Web offers to track down our targets (tools that are
unfortunately at times crippled or simply too short-lived :-)
I would say that if you are an experienced 'global' reverser you'll have more survival
chances that many others, but only your own complementary work, and your own experience,
will keep you
as a hunter and your target as a game and not the other way round... since, for instance
some of the professional spammers may turn quite nasty AGAINST you if you're not careful -and powerful- enough.
In order to gather more material, just search for 'avoiding flaming' and 'trolls flames' on
Altavista or follow some of the links below... as you'll see
there are all sort of documents and faqs on these subjects.
'Trolling for newbies' comes from 'trolling': a style of fishing
in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a byte. Real well-constructed
trolls have a double audience:
the idiots (newbies and flamers) that byte the bait and
the 'trolls-savy' that enjoy the troll. I'll try to teach you also how to
identify and track down experienced trollers, among the most interesting game out
there (together with
professional spammers on rogue ISP) for any 'professional' stalker... but let's go on with the
basic knowledges...
So, as we were saying, the basic premise is actually, often enough, that the users are NOT who they
claim to be... the danger is that the
limited identity cues may make people accept at face value
a writer's claims of
credibility: it may take a long time - and a history of dubious postings - until
people start to wonder about the actual knowledge on a
self-proclaimed expert. This said it is also true that - for web related
matters - 'official' experts are often FAR inferior to clever autodidacts, so you never
know.
Erving Goffman, in his classic work
"The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life" distinguished between the
'expressions given' and the
'expressions given off'. The former are the deliberately stated
messages indicating how the one wishes to be perceived; the latter are
the much more subtle - and sometimes unintentional - messages
communicated via action and nuance. Both forms of
expression are subject to deliberate manipulation, but the 'expression given off''
may be much harder to control. One can write 'I am
female', but sustaining a voice and reactions that are
convincingly a woman's may prove to be quite difficult for a man.
Writing style can identify the author of an posting. A known and notorious net personality hoping to appear online under a fresh name
may have an easier time disguising his or her header ID than the identity revealed in the text. The introduction to the cypherpunks
newsgroup includes this warning:
The cypherpunks list has its very own net.loon, a fellow named L. Detweiler.
The history is too long for here, but he thinks that cypherpunks are evil
incarnate. If you see a densely worded rant featuring characteristic words
such as ``medusa'', ``pseudospoofing'', ``treachery'', ``poison'', or ``black lies'',
it's probably him, no matter what the From: line says.
- Cypherpunks mailing list
In
this case, where the usual assessment signal - the name in the header - is believed to be false, language is used as a more reliable
signal of individual identity. See also an example
of a spammer using multiple identities on the very nice "Kook of the Month!" site.
One newsgroup that contains many business-card signatures is comp.security.unix. The discussion here
is about how to make unix systems secure - and about known system flaws. Many of the
participants are system administrators of major institutions, others are just learning
how to set up a
system in a fledgling company and some, of course, are hoping to learn how to break
into systems :-).
A posting suggesting
that administrators improve their sites by changing this or that line of code in
the system software could
be a furtive attempt get novice administrators to introduce security
holes. Identity deception is a big concern of the participants in
this group, and this makes it VERY interesting for any advanced studiosus of these
matters, to try soon or later his luring abilities in this group. (When you'll do
it, if you want to be taken seriously (and you'll probably don't go very far even so :-)
first create 'really' your own company, say 'Software Alternative Limited', then name
yourself 'Director of Software Development', create your domain
and sign with something like "Director@SALSoft.com".
Many varieties of identity deception can be found within the Usenet newsgroup. Some are quite harmful
to individuals or to the community; others are innocuous, benefitting the performer without injuring the
group. Some are clearly deceptions, meant to provide a false impression; others are more subtle identity
manipulations, similar to the adjustments in self-presentation we make in many real world situations.
ntil recently, header information was quite reliable. Most people accessed Usenet with software that
inserted the account name automatically - one had to be quite knowledgeable to change the default data.
Today, many programs simply let the writer fill in the name and address to be used, making posting with a
false name and site is much easier. The astute observer may detect suspicious anomalies in the routing
data (the record of how the letter passed through the net) that can expose a posting from a falsified
location. Yet few people are likely to look that closely at a posting unless they have reason to be
suspicious about its provenance.
It is useful to distinguish between pseudonymity and pure anonymity. In the
virtual world, many degrees
of identification are possible. Full anonymity is one extreme of a continuum
that runs from the totally
anonymous to the thoroughly named. A pseudonym, though it may be untraceable
to a real-world person,
may have a well-established reputation in the virtual domain; a pseudonymous
message may thus come
with a wealth of contextual information about the sender. A purely anonymous
message, on the other
hand, stands alone.
There are some useful tricks to narrow down the number of suspected targets in
order to stalk a pseudonym user. One of the best ones I know of is the time trick, but
in order to understand it you mist first know the elementary elements of an email header.
Searching through headers and other
tricks
(This part -I should have checked- comes directly
from Symantec's page ~ begin)
Here is a sample email header (colors added). The final receiver's address is
'you@your.domain.com'.
Received: (2228 bytes)
by <your.domain.com> via sendmail with
P:stdio/D:user/T:local (sender:
<29086328@compuserve.com>) id m0xUFxr-001cL6C@your.domain.dom for you@your.domain.com; Sat,
8 Nov 1997 10:50:35 -0800 (PST) (Smail-3.2.0.98 1997-Oct-16 #12 built 1997-Oct-28) Received: from simon.pacific.net.sg (simon.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.72]) by
your.domain.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA01565; Sat, 8 Nov 1997 10:43:34 -0800 (PST) From: 29086328@compuserve.com Received: from pop1.pacific.net.sg (pop1.pacific.net.sg
[203.120.90.85]) by simon.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id CAA25373; Sun, 9
Nov 1997 02:44:51 +0800 (SGT) Received: from
po.pacific.net.sg (hd58-032.hil.compuserve.com
[199.174.238.32]) by pop1.pacific.net.sg with SMTP id CAA12179; Sun, 9 Nov
1997 02:43:10 +0800 (SGT) Received: from mail.compuserve.com (mail.compuserve.com
(205.5.81.86)) by compuserve.com (8.8.5/8.6.5)
with SMTP id GAA04211 for <87789123456@aol.com>
It may look confusing, but there are some patterns that tell you everything you need to
know. The header can be broken into several sections, each beginning with the word
"Received".
The first 'Received'
is from your email server. This section lists the supposed
sender, the message ID number, and when the message
came in. The other 'Received: from' tags are
from remailers that the spammer used to make it more difficult to track him/her down.
- Find the last 'Received: from' entry in the header.
This usually shows the originating server.
- Find and write down the server domain and its IP address.
This information appears in parenthesis in each 'Received: from'
entry.
Machine Name |
IP Address |
| mail.compuserve.com |
205.5.81.86 |
| hd58-032.hil.compuserve.com |
199.174.238.32 |
| popl.pacific.net.sg |
203.120.90.85 |
| simon.pacific.net.sg |
203.120.90.72 |
(This part -I should have checked- comes directly
from Symantec's page ~ end)
Of course you should by all means read Gandalf's info, which is far superior to the
Symantec information above, at http://ddi.digital.net/~gandalf/spamfaq.html
More URLs to help you figure out how to look at the headers:
http://www.concentric.net/~Nvam
http://help.mindspring.com/features/emailheaders/index.htm
http://help.mindspring.com/features/emailheaders/extended.htm
Time pattern matters (fravia's trick)
Now, all the above can be easily faked, what could be really important is that you may be able
(unfortunately NOT always :-) to discern the TIMES of the day "patterns" when these operations have been
performed that you can read above. See: if your target
updates his web page, or mails letters to usenet, he will mostly
tend to do it on a REGULAR basis. Even if
he uses automated dynamic providers like Compuserve or AOL (which is always a good idea),
and even if he writes to the usenet groups through an
anonymous remailer, or DejaNew itself or whatever, he will tend to do it at FIXED TIMES. It is sometime incredibly
easy to find out in which part of the world a target lives just studying his timing patterns!.
Most of the people work on Internet in the evening hours, say between 21 and 24:00 local time.
A common used 'luring' techniques consists in publishing or emailing to your target some 'luring baits' (in order to get the target to react) indicating a (faked and bogus) page of yours on some
free server, where you have -supposedly- put something that
the target badly needs or is interested into. Examining the loggings for that page
you'll be able to see WHEN the target has accessed it. Many targets will access it
anonymously just in case, yet few targets are careful enough to do that at an "abnormal" hour of the
day.
Deleted postings (Balif's trick)
It may at times be useful to check which cancel messages have been sent to
the newsgroups.
As Balif pointed out in a famous posting on alt.2600:
to examine all the cancel messages, you can use Dejanews, which does
not honor them but actually archives them. Do a power search on group
alt.2600, for "control cancel", sorted by date. You can see there all cancel
messages coming from a given address.
Unfortunately Dejanews strips important headers. On your news server,
cancel messages do not appear in the newsgroup, and are unseen to you.
However you can view them by looking in the group "control.cancel". Beware,
this group will most likely be enormous. It contains every cancel message
your news server has received for all groups. Mine had 75,000 some messages.
Here you can examine the headers of the cancel message. Yet it takes feeling and
time to stalk information in this way.
Sharp edges (SPUTUM's trick)
Say you have as your target your balooney@enemy.com; do Altavista and
Dejanews searches for balooney@enemy.com looking for eventual postings where
you may find his real name. Especially check all various alt.test.whatever
groups, as these may contain at least one instance of 'rough' preparatory
postings, when the target fine-tuned her newsreader's configuration.
Do Altavista and Dejanews searches on any "sharp edge" that sticks out.
"Sharp
edges" are,
according to SPUTUM "unique characteristics which can lead one to the real poster".
Example: balooney@enemy.com may use as Organization: "balooney inc." on all his
Usenet posts. Maybe he forgot to remove this info when posting later.
You search for "Organization: balooney inc." (as well as for posts
containing his sig), and maybe find all his fatuous
posts to alt.fetish.threelegs, and from thence
you will find (if you'r lucky) his narcissistic website chock full of juicy
personal information (or at least of many more "sharp edges").
Other promising "sharp edges": trailing user name in path
(...!news.foo.com!imamoron), funky newsreaders (ZippityDooDah News Alpha
0.9), unique signature components.
You may add signature patterns, and even particular
emoticons like :--> :*) 8-[
Look hard.
Be clever. Reverse your target.
There is a whole section of mine, about sharp edges:
read my
Language patterns and the stalking tablet section.
3) What if the target used "X-No-Archive: yes" in her headers and all previous
steps fail? You may get lucky, and find a follow-up to a previous post
which was posted without the "no-archive" clause. Otherwise, the
old fashioned 'heavy' way might work: go to the relevant Usenet newsgroup, sort the
posters by author name, and look for your target "by hand". Yes the task
can be extremely tedious...which is why real stalking is for the patient hunter.
__Enemy identification__
An interesting example: the "Bokler guy" identification
This is an old 'historical' example, yet it will quickly show you the power of Dejanew stalking: was one of the links on my
old links.htm page: an "enemy" wich I described
as "worth investigating". In reality this guy is not an "enemy" of
anybody (he only produces in visual basic
pretty simple encryption software) and his "cracker page" is not so bad at all, he use it
as "scarecrow" for the
potential buyer of his software. Hope he will not grudge me if I use him as an ideal subject
for this lesson... anyway he makes money
scaring people with our work, I'll scare him for free showing him what I
know about him :-)
Here is the original link to his
page if you want to visit it:
An 
enemy worth
investigating
If we hit the page above we'll see as only reference a post office box:
Bokler Software Corp.
P.O. Box 261
Huntsville, AL 35804
Tel: (205) 539-9901
Fax: (205) 882-7401
e-mail: info@bokler.com
Now, let's say we want to know who is the guy behind all this...
1) Fire DejaNews
2) Search for something on his page
(he makes software, he surely did not resist the
temptation to publicize it in some usenet, ideal DejaNews target... let's search for "haschipher")
And here is the answer:
Subject: Re: How to store passwords encrypted in file?
From: jim@bokler.com (James A. Moore)
Date: 1996/06/26
Message-Id: <31D0C943.57429273@news.hiwaay.net>
References: <4QLTU1$bd4@cd4680fs.rrze.uni-erlangen.de>
Organization: HiWAAY Information Services
Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
See http://www.bokler.com for encryption tools: DEScipher/VBX & /OCX,
and HASHcipher.
James Moore
Now we have some more interesting data:
jim@bokler.com (James A. Moore)
SO, "real" name and a "real" email... what can we get more?
Well, let's have a look at
his *RECENT* interests...
Number of articles posted to individual newsgroups (slightly skewed by cross-postings):
11 comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
6 comp.lang.basic.visual.3rdparty
4 comp.security.misc
3 comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
3 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
2 alt.security
2 comp.os.ms-windows.apps.utilities
2 comp.os.ms-windows.apps.word-proc
2 sci.crypt
1 alt.lang.delphi
1 comp.ai.fuzzy
1 comp.databases.ms-access
1 comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
1 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.software.backoffice
1 comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc
1 comp.unix.questions
Uugh! A Visual Basic buff... can we gather something more searching for
James Moore? Let's try and let's poke around a little
using a search inside the most used newsgroup:
6 Hits for Query on DESchipher inside comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Date Scr Subject Newsgroup Author
1. 96/08/12 017 Re: Form1.Show(1) and En comp.lang.basic.vis jim@bokler.com (Jam
2. 96/06/18 017 Re: Encryption for Visua comp.lang.basic.vis jim@bokler.com (Jam
3. 95/10/21 017 Visual Basic Control (VB comp.lang.basic.vis info@bokler.com (Bo
4. 96/04/27 016 Re: Password encrypting comp.lang.basic.vis jim@bokler.com (Jam
5. 95/11/23 016 Re: Protection from pass comp.lang.basic.vis dbrockle@compusense
6. 96/01/09 013 VBX for Data Encryption. comp.lang.basic.vis jim@bokler.com (Jam
Well, let's have a look at this suspicious (from november 1995) Darren Brocklehurst
(email address dbrockle@compusense.com -> Darren Brocklehurst), this is the only old
letter about DESchipher, is a bad concealed publicity of Bokler software as you can
yourself read Re: Protection from password cracks? i.e. alt.cracks
(Ah! What they
would not do for some more money, the commercial programmers!) and there is something
interesting in this name (Brockle-->Bokler): and see his profile!
Number of articles posted to individual newsgroups (slightly skewed by cross-postings):
123 comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
35 comp.lang.basic.visual.3rdparty
26 comp.lang.basic.visual.database
1 comp.lang.basic.misc
1 comp.lang.basic.visual
1 comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
1 sci.electronics
His profile is almost identical with our "James A. Moore"! Where does our
Brocklehurst live? (Yahoo search)
D M Brocklehurst
Albuquerque,NM 87112
(505)299-0562
So, he lives in New Mexico too...
And do we have a James. A. Moore in New mexico somewhere?
James Moore
701 W San Mateo Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87505-3921
(505)988-4370
MMM.. Sounds good: Do we have here the real guy and his pal?
Let's first check out something else: using whowhere
and the previous address we'll find the following:
Bokler Software Corp
Santa Fe, New Mexico
United States of America
good! So the Bokler company is actually registered in
New Mexico, who answers the Alabama telephon? (Four11 search)
Jim Moore
Alabama,
United States Of America
E-Mail Address: bockler_1@HIWAAY.NET
So is simply his HIWAAY provider, rerouting email. Telephon may also
be rerouted in the same way.
Anyway if we use Infospace we get the address and
the real provider of the web space the other way round:
CompanyName: Bokler Software Corp
Address: 1570 Pacheco, Suite E-4
City: Santa Fe
State: New Mexico
Contact: bockler_1@HIWAAY.NET
Domains: BOKLER.COM
There it is: the company is registered in Santa Fe, the provider is in Alabama.
Obviously such a small
thing does not have a real server, and is hosted by somebody, in this case
everything on the Bokler page comes through the "hiwaay" business spider, so we can now
definitely narrow in on and confirm New Mexico.
Now we started with almost nothing and we found two names, two addresses, two private telephon
numbers. Brocklehurst should be the
real identity only if the "James Moore" name is just an Avatar (which I do not really
believe given the "Visualbasicality" of these guys). "Darren Brocklehurst" is more probably a co-worker at Bokler
or a good friend of James Moore and this is the guy we searched for... all in all a pretty good "counter intelligence"
work!
__Enemy investigation__
An interesting example about Dejanews itself is here
Well, yes, Dejanew, as you'll learn on this very page is a very powerful stalking tool
indeed, and the question "who hydes behind dejanew?" is therefore particularly legitime. (Watch it, part of the info needs to be updated:
Dejanews has changed in the last 12 months!)
__Enemy investigation__
An EXTREMELY interesting example is
Balif's debunking.
You need a little background information about this: in the last couple of years
alt.2600 (an old Usenet hacking group) has been heavily spammed by a guy known as
'Archangel', that
used some of the most know techniques: flaming, trolling, crossposting, faked avatars and
gang emailing, in order
to gain some dubious personal fame. Of course, in the eyes of
any reverser worth is weight, Archangel's claims (on an Usenet group!) of
having worked for the CIA and his 'attention seeking' activities
did disqualify him immediately (no really competent person would ever 'seek
attention' on Usenet), yet hundred
of lusers and newbyes believed - and unfortunately still believe - the whole archangelology
to be interesting stuff. (As Brian points out, it is relatively easy, on Usenet, to
brag about things you do not know about). If you follow
the link above you'll be able to read the results of Balif's stalking activity. Balif,
a promising hacker, and an incredibly good stalker,
has used intensively dejanews in order to reconstruct the 'history' of the spammer
Archangel. Mind you: the whole Archangel saga is pretty boring (a typical case of 'flogging
a dead horse' on usenet: taking topics that have been done to death and rehashing them), and
DEFINITELY not worth investigating per se yet Balif's page deserves
your visit if you want to learn how to perform a thorough stalking work.
BTW, if you want to investigate an earlier stalking project, here you go with Brian's
electel balif's plot, where,
among other things, you can also see what a good
stalker gets out of a picture!
__Enemy investigation__
Some other examples: if you are interested in stalking you'll always get quite interesting info
from the 'antispammers' fronts:
http://www.blighty.com/products/spade/help/d_spam104.htm: Bill Mattock's stalking of a spammer.
http://www.blighty.com/products/spade/help/d_spam104.htm: Bill Mattock's stalking of a pyramid scheme.
SPUTUM:
Spamkilling Personal Interface (Tactical, Enhanced) The three basic spammer types and how to stalk them. (This is the
fundamental tutorial on analyzing usenet headers!)
__Let's find out who__
Interesting various links
http://www.netmeg.net/faq/internet/net-abuse/troll-faq/ Gandalf's 'Dealing with Trolls'
search_forms (heavy)
search_forms (light)
http://www.warezfaq.org/indexx.html
The warez faq, useful also for
stalking purposes.
How to search
http://www.melsa.net/internet/tut11.htm How to avoid flaming.
Internet
Address finder
Stalker
page
http://www.anywho.com/telq.html: Reverse Telephone Search
page
DejaNews, the ultimate stalking tool
http://www.supernews.com/index10.html, another stalking tool
http://www.reference.com, yet another one
http://www.talkway.com/usenet/, yet another one
Whowhere people finder
All1one people finder
__How to keep in exercise__
For a reverser, stalking can as much great fun as reversing software protections.Next time you receive some
spamming email DO NOT throw it away. Be cool, and try some of the tricks/techniques described
above to stalk the spammer. If you have time you may even try the 'go for it'
trick: most spammers,
even among the most capable forging dudes, are infact trying to SELL you something,
aren't they? There dwells the real
weak point of these assholes. Somewhere, at a given moment
they have to give you either a real address or a real telephone
number or whatever in order for you to send them your money.
Fishing spammers can be real fun therefore, especially if you have time, patience, flair and a
little
dose of social engineering capabilities.
Once you have them you can administer your favoured punishment, from denouncing them to their
upstream ISPs supplying service (not always useful) to slowbomb them (until they
change real address) with
faked clients requests and bogus orders for whatever product
they sell (very funny and frustrating for
them). This is also IMHO the best method to deal with pyramid schemes: just let a dozen
postmaster@[127.0.0.1] or whatever enter the scheme eh eh.
A word of advice: don't choose too dangerous gamebirds at the beginning: real nasty people can
be quite dangerous on the net. It is one thing to stalk a peaceful experienced troller, it is a completely
different thing to stalk a ring of high-level protected commercial paedophiles. Learn
your stalking, luring and logical reversing
ABCs first and don't go around shooting yourself in your feet.
This section of my site, under perennial construction,
was started on 15 november 1996
fravia's antispam related page
homepage
links
+ORC
bots wars
students' essays
counter measures
bots wars
antismut CGI tricks
academy database
tools
javascript tricks
cocktails
search_forms
mail_fravia+
Is software reverse engineering illegal?
(c) Fravia, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999.
All rights reserved